The Medical News Report, November, 2014
Sam La Monte, M.D., FACS
Advances in Medicine and Healthcare
Report #34
WEBSITE:
www.themedicalnewsreport.com
Do you want to subscribe to my reports?
If you are already getting my reports
monthly, you are subscribed! My mailing
list has grown enormously, thanks to the
interest in my reports over the past 12
years. The subscription is free,
there are no ads, and I don’t sell your
name, etc. to anyone, like business, and
some hospitals do. This is my ministry,
and my way of giving back for 30 years
of a fabulous private practice. Just
email me at
samlamonte@gmail.com, and I will add you to my confidential list. I will confirm you are on
the list when you request it. Put me on
your contact list to prevent me from
being blocked. Share with your friends
and family.
Thank you, Dr. Sam
Subjects:
1.
Simple Rules for a Healthy Heart Diet
2.
Blood Thinner Scandal—Big Pharma is at
it again
3.
A New Less-addictive Narcotic approved
by the FDA
4.
Healthcare Update-Obamacare, Medicare
5.
The Endocrine System—Part 3—Parathyroid
glands, Calcitonin, Vitamin D, and
Calcium Metabolism for healthy bones,
muscles, nerves, cell function
6.
Prostate Cancer--Part
3--Diagnosis—general information and the
Gleason
Score for aggressiveness of cancer
7.
This year’s Nobel Prize in
Medicine—Implications for Alzheimer’s
disease
8.
Some personal thoughts about Ebola
I hope many of you
experienced the beautiful leaves
changing. The First Annual Fall Fest was
a big success. Over 2000 visitors
enjoyed a chamber of commerce day in Sky
Valley. What a great month up here. The
leaves are now falling.
This month turns our minds to
Thanksgiving and a time for family. With
the world in complete turmoil, I can
only pray for peace in the world,
recovery for our country, and new
governance in our Congress. We are in a
make or break time for the America as we
know it. Happy Thanksgiving! God bless
America!

AT THE END OF THIS
REPORT, I HAVE MADE SOME PERSONAL
COMMENTS TO FOLLOW UP ON THE RECENT
EMAILS I HAVE SENT YOU ABOUT EBOLA
1.
Simple Rules for a Heart Healthy
Diet
Medscape—Cardiology,
an internet site that I follow closely
has distilled the issue down to simple
terms. This is not brain surgery. Here
are the facts:
a)
Americans eat too many calories.
b)
We eat too much saturated fat in pizza, chips, processed meats,
and red meat. We eat too many carbohydrates
in desserts, colas, candy, and starches
(white stuff-potatoes, pasta, rice,
breads).
c)
We
don’t eat enough vegetables and fruit.
d)
We
don’t exercise enough.
e)
We depend on medications TOO MUCH (blood
pressure, diabetic meds, statins,Lovaza
etc.) to control our cholesterol,
triglycerides, and blood sugar too much.
One study stated that patients that
depend on pills tend to eat 10%
more calories on
average than those who use diet as the
main action to keep healthy. These meds
DO NOT give you a free pass to the
buffet.
f) We
don’t manage our stress well.
g) We do
not get enough sleep (need at least 7-8
hours)
h) We are
fast becoming the most obese country in
the world.
i) As
many as one third of patients don’t take
their medications as prescribed or not
at all.
j) We are
not role models for our children
regarding a recommended healthy diet.
k) We
drink too much alcohol and still smoke.
l) To
reduce calories, we use artificial
sweeteners.
They cause
problems with changing the gut bacteria
that actually allows sugar to be better
absorbed, thus cancelling the small
benefit of sweeteners. It is being
hypothesized that it is actually
increasing type 2 diabetes.
So, we must reverse these things to give
ourselves a shot at a long life. Do
Americans really care? Are we in denial?
Are we too busy to pay attention to our
health? What is your answer?
It
is simple, don’t abuse the above, eat
more vegetables and fruit, and get off
the couch and off the electronics. (I am guilty of
the last one, obviously!)
 
2. Big Pharma is at it again—oral
anticoagulants--the blood
thinners—hiding the truth!

Big Pharma has been
caught again
withholding information about a drug,
and this time, it is very serious.
Dabigatran (Pradaxa)
is one of the new anticoagulants
on the market. These new fixed dosage
drugs were touted as a big advantage
over Coumadin, including reducing the
risk of bleeding by 40% and not needing
a blood test to be sure the drug level
was correct. These new meds were said to
be more effective keeping the patient
anti-coagulated and minimizing bleeding
risks.
Coumadin requires a weekly blood
test for safety (prothrombin time), and
it does have a significant risk of
bleeding. The pharmaceutical companies
market the drug and do not recommend
blood test monitoring.
The pharmaceutical
company
Boeringer-Ingleheim marketed the
new oral anti-coagulant Pradaxa to be
safer than Coumadin and did not need
monitoring of blood levels of the drug.
Through the Freedom and Information Act,
the British
Medical Journal, found documents that
clearly showed that monitoring blood
levels of Pradaxa would make the drug
safer. Bleeding from any of these
anti-coagulants can be catastrophic,
including gastro-intestinal and cerebral
hemorrhage.
When the FDA
approved these drugs, they questioned
the lack of blood level testing, but
because these oral anticoagulants were
supposedly 40% more effective in
preventing stroke and embolism than
warfarin (Coumadin), they apparently let
it pass. Was there a payoff?? What was
the federal government thinking? Why
would Big Pharma lie? MONEY!
The files of the pharmaceutical
company documented that some patients
needed less than 150mg. for adequate
anticoagulation. The drug company also
had records that showed there was
considerable fluctuation of blood levels
with this drug on the same dose, which
is very undesirable.
The bottom line…a test needs to be made
available commercially to monitor the
initiation of this drug in patients to
find out what dose gave maximum benefit
without an increased bleeding risk. It turns out there is an
experimental test to monitor the blood
levels called the
Hemoclot
plasma test, and needs to be made
available to your doctors.
There is no test to
quantitate the risk of bleeding with
Pradaxa.
This company clearly
felt recommending blood level tests
would make their marketing more
difficult and influence their bottom
line.
For now, if you are
on one of these oral anticoagulants
because you have
atrial
fibrillation (not from a valve
problem) or need to prevent emboli
because you have had
deep vein
issues in your legs, or have
carotid or
intracranial artery evidence of stenosis,
you need to ask your doctor about this
issue.
DO NOT STOP YOUR ANTICOAGULANT WITHOUT SEEING YOUR DOCTOR AND
DISCUSSING YOUR OPTIONS. Abruptly
stopping anticoagulants can have a
rebound clotting effect. Soon, there will be
better evidence of what range the plasma
levels need to be maintained.
For safety, it is recommended a loading
dose be started, and then with blood
levels be drawn to determine a
maintenance dose. It is always a balance
between preventing a clot and not
increasing the risk of bleeding beyond
an acceptable level. I will discuss this
entire issue in the coming months.
Reference- MedPage, Medscape, and the
British Medical Journal

3.The FDA has approved a New
“less-addictive” Narcotic Pain Reliever
(Oxycodone/Naloxone)
The FDA has approved
the first narcotic combined with an
additional drug used to block the
euphoria of
oxycodone. The drug is
naloxone.
This is used to treat narcotic addicts
because it blocks some of the “high” in
the brain center. I have been waiting
for the FDA to approve this drug for
years. This can be used for serious
chronic pain. There are millions of
patients with chronic debilitating pain
that would greatly benefit from this
medication.
250
million prescriptions for pain killers
were written in 2013 .
Addiction is a major problem. But how
does a physician help a patient in
constant pain? There are pain management
doctors today that are invaluable, and I
will discuss them in a future report.
Ask your doctor about referring you to a
doctor who is board
certified in pain management.
There are no regular doctors out there
that can just decide to be a “pain
doctor”. These doctors wind up being
“pill pushers”. These doctors need to
lose their licenses for abuse of their
profession. That does not mean doctors
can’t prescribe pain meds and do
everything they can to help. But with
chronic pain, a specialist should be
considered.
Naloxone/oxycodone (Tariniq XR)
was approved to prevent addicts from
crushing narcotic pills and snorting the
powder. BUT, addicts will find their
drugs somewhere. One pharmaceutical
company has created a hard-to-crush
oxycodone tablet. Everyone must know if
you take narcotics for long, you will
need to take more and more to get the
same pain relief (it is called
tachyphylaxis), and then the
addiction begins.
Oxycodone, a synthetic codeine,
is a time release drug, and a wonderful
pain killer for a short period. I
performed a lot of surgeries that
required significant pain relief for a
week or so. After a week or so, I tried
transitioning them less powerful pain
meds. Patients need to understand that
procedures cause pain. Expecting to be
pain free is not what someone should
expect.

This pathetic excuse for a doctor was
selling prescriptions to patients,
overdosing patients with oxycodone and
tranquilizers, and indirectly caused the
death of several patients. His bogus
pain management clinic was closed and he was found guilty of
2 counts of manslaughter, 180 counts of
selling narcotic prescriptions to
addicts. This person was an
anesthesiologist and on the weekend saw
an average of 120 patients a day. It
took 3 years to bring this disgrace of a
doctor to justice. He remains in jail
awaiting his sentence of 15 years for
second degree manslaughter.There are
many more out there like him. Shame!
Reference-Medscape
4. Healthcare Update-Obamacare,
Medicare, etc.
Healthcare continues
to dominate the concerns of Americans
(along with unemployment, the economy,
Ebola, and the threat of terrorism).
Although there are close to 10 million
Americans who have signed up for health
insurance, many of these people had
insurance already. In fact, many, who
were told their insurance was dropped
because it didn’t meet the stringent
rules of Obamacare, were given a chance
to re-sign. Many younger people under 26
are still on their parent’s insurance.
Are they going to be ready to be
responsible for their own insurance at
27? No one has been fined yet for not
buying insurance. I am impressed that a
good percentage of younger people have
signed up, which was the secret to the
success of the program. Small business
has been given another year of grace
before they are required to have
insurance for their employees. Hundreds
of businesses have dropped employees
below 30 hours, so they don’t qualify
for benefits. Many low priced policies
are limited regarding the option of
doctors and hospitals. Meeting their
deductibles and co-pays has become a
huge issue. The problem continues to
exist, and these folks still wait until
their disease has progressed before they
see a doctor. The feds won’t give a
number of those who are behind on
premium payments. I suspect it is
thousands if not more.
Obamacare is not about
healthcare savings for millions and
reform as advertised. It is about
coverage. There is no reform (making
healthcare more accessible at a cheaper
price for all). Medicine has not become
more efficient and cheaper. It will be
2020, so say the experts, before we know
if healthcare is costing less. I am not
hopeful. I can promise you one
thing….doctors are making less, and
working more hours trying to make up for
the loss. Patients are waiting longer to
be seen, and the time spent with their
doctor has decreased. You are seeing
nurse practitioners and PAs instead of
your doctor. That is not all that bad,
if they have a doctor there to back them
up (17 states do not require that).
Those of you who are still working at 65
and have good insurance with their
employer do not necessarily need to join
Medicare just because they are 65. If
they have a poor
policy, of course, join Medicare.
Another option is to join Part A
(hospital bills) of Medicare, because it
is free. You do not need to join Part B
(physician’s bills) or Part D (drugs).
Most think it is mandatory, but it is
not unless your company has a policy
that says they will no longer cover you
at 65. Bigger companies usually do not
require you to drop the company
insurance.
One last thing……the Federal Government’s Inspector General (IG) announced that in 16
states the cost of healthcare is rising
in hospitals that employ physicians.
The last time I researched it, over 60%
of physicians were employed. Private
medicine is dead! Concierge’ medicine is
an option. I will report on them in the
future.
Big hospitals have
better bargaining power with insurance
companies and, in one report, Blue Cross
Blue Shield was reimbursing certain
hospital/doctor complex 25-30% more than
the competitors. Do you really think
they are going to pass that savings
along to the consumer?
Obamacare has been successful in
many ways, but not in what it said it
was created for: lower price, more
access, and better medical care. Ref:
Medscape General Surgery
Go to:
www.medicare.gov for your answers
and talk to your insurance company.

Times have changed!!
Hard to believe what you can
read in the media. Look at this ad back
in the 50s.
5. Endocrine System-- Parathyroid
glands, Calcitonin, Vitamin D and
calcium metabolism
SUMMARY:
This report
on the parathyroid glands is another in
a series about the ENDOCRINE SYSTEM,
which is the organ system responsible
for secretion of HORMONES-THYROID, CALCITONIN, PARATHORMONE, ESTROGEN,
TESTOSTERONE, INSULIN, CORTISONE, GROWTH
HORMONE, OXYTOCIN, ADRENALIN, THE
HORMONE THAT CAUSES OVULATION,
MELATONIN, ETC. In fact, I refer you to
Wikipedia for an exhaustive list of
hormones, most of which you have never
heard of.
www.wikipedia/hormones.com
I also refer you to
last 2 reports about the governing
system of the endocrine glands (the
hypothalamus of the brain and the
pituitary gland, an outpouching of the
brain). Click on the link:
Medical News Report #30
and
Medical News Report #31
These glands are
vital for the body to function.
Deficiency and excessive hormone creates
serious disorders in growth, body type,
health, diabetes, sexual development,
lack of the body to respond to stress,
sleep, etc. The reason I am reporting on
this organ system, will give you a much
better picture of how your body
functions. A sub-specialty of Internal
Medicine is devoted to
this….Endocrinology. Having discussed
the brain, pituitary, and the thyroid,
this month, I will report on parathyroid
glands.
The ANATOMY of the Parathyroid glands—There
are four tiny glands that are embedded
in the thyroid gland (see diagram on
left below). These glands are intimately
attached to the trachea. A back view is
shown on the left and the diagram on the
right shows the front view with the
regional anatomy). These four glands are
each about the size of a piece of rice.
THE FUNCTION--These glands are
responsible for maintaining
normal
calcium levels in the blood and
are also involved with how bone either
releases or takes in calcium. Without
these glands, the calcium levels will
drop to dangerous levels. The hormone is
called
PARATHORMONE.
 
The Function of the
Parathyroid Glands
Look at the complex function of the
parathyroid glands with the body organs
to either remove or retain calcium in
the system. The diagram is below. It
does not include Calcitonin, which it
should

The level of calcium
in the blood is
controlled by parathormone, Vitamin D,
Calcitonin:
1.
Parathormone stimulates
bone deposition of
calcium.
It also stimulates the
small
intestine to retain calcium from
the diet and also stimulates the
kidney
to reabsorb calcium. These three organs
provide for steady blood levels of
calcium. We call this normal homeostasis
of calcium.
2.
Vitamin D
is absorbed and stored in the liver, and
when needed also plays a major role in
calcium levels, because it is needed to
produce parathormone. 3.
3.Thyrocalcitonin, another
hormone secreted by the thyroid gland,
stimulates release of calcium from bone.
It is released when the calcium levels
lower and are also released by stomach
hormones (gastrin
and pentagastrin), which make the
intestines absorb more calcium from the
diet.
Think of
thyrocalcitonin as an antagonist of
parathormone. The former releases
calcium from the bone and thus the blood
calcium rises, and parathormone
stimulates calcium to deposit in the
bones.It is this complex interaction of
parathormone and calcitonin, and vitamin
D (and the parathyroids, the intestines,
bone, and kidney) that keeps bones
strong, nerves and the brain functioning
normally and allows for normal cardiac
and neural metabolism. Note that the
diagram above omits calcitonin.
Diseases of the parathyroid glands:
1. Primary Hyperparathyroidism--elevated
calcium (hypercalcemia).
Causes--The most common
cause is a benign growth of one or more
parathyroid glands. Since these glands
are the size of a piece of rice, and
identification requires a special scan.
This disorder causes that particular
gland to secretetoo
much parathormone and will cause
hypercalcemia. There are less
common causes of this disorder including
a) familial,
b)being bedbound for long periods of time,
c) excess calcium in the diet (greater than
1200 mg/dl per day), d) hyperthyroidism,
d)kidney failure, f)medications such as
lithium for bipolar disease and thiazides (a group of diuretics),
g)Infectious diseases such as
tuberculosis, h)Paget’s disease of the
bone, and i) sarcoidosis also can cause
this disorder. Women over 50 are
most prone to this disorder.
Symptoms and Signs
of hypercalcemia
may be minimal for some time.
Thirst and
excessive urination (just like in
diabetes),
bone pain (because the bones are
losing calcium),
kidney
stones, muscle cramps or weakness,
and even
depression can occur.
Upset
stomach, nausea and vomiting, and
constipation also may appear.
Depending on how
high the calcium level climbs (greater
than 12mg/dl), surgical removal of the
enlarged parathyroid gland is
recommended.
About 1 in 4 patients will need surgery.
Medical treatment
includes calcitonin, dialysis,
diuretics, bisphosphonates (these are
the medications used to treat
osteoporosis and will be discussed with
that disorder in the future).
Intravenous fluids,and glucocorticoids
(cortisone) may be necessary.
2. Secondary Hyperparathyroidismcan
be caused by
cancer, especially metastatic
breast and
prostate cancer to the bones.
These tumors make the bones lose
calcium, thus raising the blood level of
calcium.
Multiple myeloma and Hodgkins lymphoma
and lung cancer can secrete
parathormone-like hormones.
3. Hypoparathyroidism(hypocalcemia-low
calcium)
Causes—it
is caused by damage to or removal of
these glands during
thyroidectomy, especially in
cancers that require more extensive
surgery. This happens in 1-2% of
thyroidectomies. All patients are
monitored for this post-op. There are
two tests that the surgeon/nurse can do
at the bedside (Chvostek’s
sign—tapping the facial nerve in
front of the ear, and using a blood
pressure cuff to put pressure on the arm
which will make the hand to spasm (Trouseau’s
sign). Of course, blood levels
can be drawn as well. In 30 years, I
experienced one case that had transient
low calcium, probably due to bruising of
these tiny glands. IV calcium will
immediately
Other less common
causes are
a) autoimmune, magnesium depletion,
b) vitamin
D deficiency, c) acute pancreatitis,
d) special types of prostate and breast
cancer (osteoblastic), and e) chemotherapy
(cisplatin, 5 FU, and Leukovorin). I
will explain osteoblastic and
osteoclastictumors when I report on the
subject of bone metastases in the
future. For now, an osteoblastic tumor
causes bone formation and pulls calcium
out of the blood, thus lowering the
calcium level.
Symptoms include tetany
(spasm of the muscles), muscle cramps.
The EKG will show a specific electrical
abnormality (prolonged Q-T interval).
Treatment
includes
calcium and parathormone. Finding the
underlying disease creates the
differential diagnosis that doctors will
investigate when a patient demonstrates
low blood calcium.
A diet rich in
calcium, eating Tums, and taking calcium
supplements will alleviate the problem
without a treatable underlying cause.
Green leafy vegetables, meat, and
fortified food products such as cereal
and dairy products. Be
sure you consult with your doctor about
taking supplemental calcium, because
excessive intake of calcium increases
the likelihood of stomach trouble and
kidney stones.
Osteoporosis will be
discussed when I report on menopause at
a later date.
Reference-Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic,
Medline, Wikipedia
6.
Prostate Cancer-Part 3 Risk Factors and
The Gleason Score—how it plays a role in
Treatment
Summary—This medical
news report is the third installment on
prostate cancer. See
medical report #32 and
medical report #33
I have discussed
general information on the prostate and
how symptoms of cancer are similar to
benign enlargement of the gland. In the
future, I will report on the management
of BPH at a later date. Last month, I
reported on the controversy of the PSA
test. In fact, the feds don’t recommend
routine screening with the PSA, and just
this week the Canadian government came
out with the same recommendation. But,
these governments still recommend that
you discuss this with your doctor. Even
the American Cancer Society feels it is
the decision between you and your
doctor. Remember! Routine screening
implies no symptoms.
Not ordering a PSA
does not mean you don’t need a routine
digital rectal exam and consideration
for a stool specimen for analysis for
abnormal DNA and blood for the early
detection of colorectal cancer. This
month I will review some facts about
prostate cancer and the GLEASON SCORE,
which helps oncologists decide the
aggressiveness of a cancer on
transrectal prostate biopsies.
Risk factors--Americans
could prevent close to 90% of prostate
cancers with a proper diet, reports
Johns Hopkins (Prostate Health
Briefing).
One in six men will be diagnosed with
prostate cancer and
one in
thirty six will die from it. This
is the second most common cancer
diagnosed in men (lung cancer is #1).
The most potent risk factor is AGE,
since the older a man gets, the higher
the chance, especially black Americans.
Family history plays a key role
especially with a father or brothers.
A
gene HPC1
mutation is the most common gene
abnormality, but gene testing is still
at an early stage. Multiple prostate
infections are NOT A RISK FACTOR.90%
of prostate cancers are diagnosed in the
local or regional stage (I will
discuss this next month with options for
treatment). If the cancer is treated at
the local or regional stage, the
survival rate is close to 100%. If it
metastasizes to bone and other distant
organs, 28% survive 5 years. Most men
with prostate cancer die of other causes
rather dying of prostate cancer,
especially if they over 70. However, the
aggressiveness and stage of the disease
must be assessed before watchful waiting
is an option.
The average age of diagnosis is 68.
The
factors increasing the risk of prostate
cancer below that are
controllable:
1. Mostly vegetables
and fruits
2. Lean meat,
limited charred meats
3. Charring any
meat, chicken or fish, and BBQ {all of
these cause the formation of
nitrosamines and amines which are
carcinogenic}
4. Minimum intake of
preservatives {especially nitrosamines
in processed meats}
5. Low fat intake
6. Low carbs
7. Adequate exercise
8. Normal weight
maintenance.
9. Smoking increases
the risk.
10. Vasectomy is
thought to be a factor, albeit minimal.
11. Taking
testosterone is thought not to cause
cancer, but if taken by men, it adds
fuel to the fire if the cancer is
testosterone sensitive.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT OF THE
SUPPLEMENTS RECALLED BY THE FDA, 60%
CONTAINED UNLAWFUL PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE
IN THEM, AND TESTOSTERONE AND
ANDROSTEROIDS WERE 2 OF THE MOST COMMON.
This could secretly fuel a prostate
cancer.
12. Obesity causes
10% of all cancers and is a significant
risk factor in prostate cancer.
13. Type 2 diabetes
is linked through obesity and insulin
resistance.
How does a high fat diet and diabetes
cause problems?
It correlates with an
insulin-like
growth factor (IGF-1), hormone
metabolism, and free radical
formation…all factors in oncogenesis (oncogene
causing cancer). We also know that
obesity has caused an epidemic of type
II diabetes, which is caused by insulin
resistance (the insulin does not
adequately lower blood sugar and
accumulates at a high level). High
insulin levels correlate with a higher
risk of prostate cancer.
Are there any supplements that might
lower the risk of prostate cancer?
Selenium
(not to exceed 200 micrograms per day),
vitamin D and E, Omega 3 fatty
acids
(some studies say it is the ratio of
Omega 3 and 6 that is crucial—much more
Omega 3) are thought to help. More
research is needed to substantiate
findings in small studies. There is also
a study out that states Omega 3 can help
prevent recurrence in prostate cancer.
Lycopene(a
carotenoid) found in tomato sauce is
thought to reduce oxidative stress. I
HAVE DISCUSSED ANTIOXIDANTS AND
OXIDATIVE STRESS IN A PAST REPORT—see
Medical News Report #10
Polyphenols in green tea
is known to be
an excellent anti-oxidant.
Although not
specifically stated for prostate cancer,
there is increasing evidence that a
chemical in
turmeric (curcumin) used to make curry
is another very potent
anti-oxidant and some studies show a
decreased risk. The dose needed is not
known yet, because the studies have been
in the animal model only.
I HAVE STATED TIME
AND AGAIN THAT THE NATURAL FORMS OF
THESE SUPPLEMENTS IS FAR SUPERIOR TO
TAKING PILLS, SO BE CAREFUL IN MAKING
THE SUPPLEMENT INDUSTRY ANY MORE RICH
THAN THEY ALREADY ARE. Plus the
contaminants in these pills and capsules
may totally counteract the benefit
(heavy metals, rat excrement, arsenic,
etc.).
THE GLEASON SCORE
Definition---This
is a technique the pathologist uses to
grade the degree of how malignant the
prostatic biopsies are. A biopsy would
not have been performed if the PSA was
not elevated (as discussed last month),
so biopsies of these patients assume
there is a high index of suspicion for
cancer. Once the biopsies (usually 10-12
separate biopsies) are examined under a
microscope, the grade or score is given
based on how malignant the cell is. The
higher the number, the higher grade the
tumor cells are. Tumors are usually
graded asa) differentiated b) moderately
differentiated c) poorly differentiated.
The more poorly differentiated tumors
are the most aggressive. In the 1980s, a
doctor named Gleason, came up with this
scoring system.
The scores-
1-5
is considered questionably malignant and
correlates with a high percentage of
local pre-cancers (with no spread) or
very low grade malignancy. Most low
grade tumors are extremely slow growing
and if these patients are older, they
most likely will die of other diseases
long before the cancer could kill them.
These patients could be considered for
watchful waiting and re-biopsied in 3-6
months. These patients and their
families are sometimes reluctant to
wait, and this is a dilemma. Obviously,
the age of the patient is a big factor.
Where the real
controversy begins is with a
score of 6.
Seeing a score of 6, doctors have to
consider waiting and re-biopsing or
proceeding with treatment. Second
opinions are really necessary in this
case.
If the
score is 7-10,
physicians would recommend treatment,
assuming patients are a in good enough
physical shape to undergo treatment.
Studies have
shown that about 20% of tumors with a
Gleason score of 6 will have more
advanced disease than predicted by a
Gleason score alone.
Even though
these scores are guidelines, it requires
a knowledgeable patient and a very
experienced oncologist(s). There has
never been a better place for
second and third opinions (surgeon, radiation
therapist, and a medical oncologist
should all be consulted before a
decision is made. Refrain from anyone
else influencing you, because many men
will be very biased by their particular
treatment.
In reading a
review article in the Journal of
Oncology, doctors from Johns Hopkins
state that the Gleason score
underestimates the magnitude of the
cellular malignancy, and that is why
other criteria must be factored in, such
as clinical stage, PSA level, and how
much of the prostate contains cancer.
In the end, as
this same article points out, many
patients want treatment for fear of
dying. This is a real concern that can’t
be overlooked and can be increased by a
treatment-happy doctor. Even the type of
treatment is very difficult. There are
several studies that not surprisingly
show that surgeons recommend surgery,
radiation oncologists recommend
radiation more often. Tumor Boards keep
the discussion of a case from specialty
bias. I would never have cancer
treatment without it. I certainly did
when I had my throat cancer.
There is a lot
to consider when at advanced age a
patient is diagnosed with a very slow
growing tumor. Most physicians determine
treatment acceptability on the basis of
a man having at least a 5-10 year life
expectancy. One other fact of life is
THE LEGAL PROFESSION. Don’t think they
don’t cause overtreatment decisions,
especially if the doctor has already
been sued. Doctors are human. We need
legal reform!!!
References: Journal of Oncology
2012, American Cancer Society, New
England Journal of Medicine, The Johns
Hopkins Department of Urological
Oncology
7. The Nobel Prize winners for Medicine
2014-Implications for Alzheimer’sdisease

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or
Medicine
The Nobel Prize
winners are Drs. O’Keefe, Moser and
Moser. They made several discoveries on
cells that appear to act as a GPS for
the brain. This discovery of a
positioning area in the brain may have
serious implications for dementia
diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease.
This may be the area of the brain that
runs afoul allowing patients to get lost
and forget how to get from one point to
another.
Below there is a
diagram of the brain with 2 critical
points of neuroanatomy-the
hippocampus
and the enterorhinal cortex.
Storing information
in the brain about locations allows us
to retrace our paths. Some people are
very adept at this. But patients with
Alzheimer’s lose their ability to
recognize familiar locations and are
easily lost.
These doctors found that there
are cells in the hippocampus that are
activated when the animal model was at
certain places and other cells activated
at another place. This was discovered by
John O’Keefe in 1971, and in 2005, both
Drs.Moser discovered another type of
cell called “grid
cells” in the nearby entorhinal
cortex that generate a
coordinate
system and allow positioning and
path finding thus allowing position and
navigation.
 
Having a sense of place and an ability
to navigate are fundamental to our
existence. It is also interlinked with a
sense of distance that is based on
knowledge of previous positions. Thus a
cognitive
map can form in the brain,
represented by the diagram below.

Multiple locations are arranged over
time creating this coordinate system.
This allows for spatial navigation. This
system has been discovered in humans.
The future for research must begin to
find ways to protect these cells in
patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
Reference: Press Release from the Nobel
Assembly of the Karolinska Institute in
Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Personal Thoughts on Ebola
This subject is on all of our minds. We
can only hope and pray US assistance in
West Africa will be enough. Protecting
our country has become an issue that is
controversial, but the CDC is doing a
great job containing this disease….at
least now. Don’t blame hospitals that
are not prepared for a massively
infectious outbreak. It is virtually
impossible unless the patient is
truthful. I posted an article by an ER
doctor that makes several great points
on my
Facebook page that is worth
reading. Ebola has increased the need
for added protection for the hospitals
and personnel. It did wake us up, but
realize Ebola is much less deadly than
most Influenza outbreaks (50,000 die on
bad years), but in 1918, the Spanish Flu
pandemic killed between 10-20 million
people. It is scary, but I am convinced
we are still learning about this Ebola
disease. The public has a right to be
protected, and it appeared our
government was willing to concentrate on
West Africa at the expense of the US.
I wish politics did not get into this
issue, and now a nurse in Maine is
creating a "rights" issue over being
quarantined. No one has the right to
potentially expose others. If volunteers
want to go to West Africa, they need to
know the sacrifices they need to make.
If they need to be compensated for 3
weeks of quarantine, OK! An experimental
vaccine may be ready in a few months,
but the success and complications of
that shot will not be well-known for
some time. In France, they are paying
volunteers $895 to be tested with an
experimental vaccine. 50 students have
already signed up. The CDC says keeping
Ebola in West Africa is the best way to
prevent it from spreading. I agree, but
in the meantime, let's protect our own
country, whatever it takes. Collateral
damage in the US is not acceptable to
me.
Happy Thanksgiving!!

Stay healthy and well, my friends, Dr.
Sam
Do you want to subscribe to my reports?
If you are already getting my reports
monthly, you are subscribed! My mailing
list has grown enormously, thanks to the
interest in my reports over the past 12
years. The subscription is free,
there are no ads, and I don’t sell your
name, etc. to anyone, like business, and
some hospitals do. This is my ministry,
and my way of giving back for 30 years
of a fabulous private practice. Just
email me at
samlamonte@gmail.com, and I will add you to my confidential list. I will confirm you are on
the list when you request it. Put me on
your contact list to prevent me from
being blocked. Share with your friends
and family.
Thank you, Dr. Sam

 |